School Notes

January 28, 2010

Moorpark 8am & 10am – Argument Prompt

Filed under: Uncategorized — Administrator @ 6:05 am

Students will create an essay that either:
A) Identifies a problem and proposes a solution.
B) Defends the status quo against proposed change.

Explore one of the following topics:
• The Influence of Media
• Laws and the Justice System
• Contemporary Youth & Parenting Issues

Of course, each of the above topics is quite vague – and that’s part of the fun. The topics will be further analyzed during our readings and discussions. Students may wish to respond to a particular article found in Ideas Across Time. They may also feel free to find other subjects in which to develop arguments. For example, a student might read “The Problem That Has No Name” (an essay about female identity) and then decide to write about the problematic identity of women as portrayed by today’s media.

Determine your audience:
Don’t think of your reader as “the teacher.” Imagine that your reader is a wider audience, a group of readers. Who do you want to reach? Who do you want to challenge? Consider whether your essay is intended to be read by opponents or neutral individuals.
After you determine your audience, then consider the strategy of your essay.

Do you want to write a classic argument – in which the goal is to win?
Or do you want to write a Rogerian argument – in which the goal is to build bridges and seek beneficial compromises?

IMPORTANT:
Incorporate at least three outside sources and a works cited page. (MLA format).

Length: +1200 words

Due: February 16th

January 27, 2010

Rogerian Vs. Classic Argument Samples

Filed under: Uncategorized — Administrator @ 11:23 pm

Here are two brief arguments (extended introductions) which demonstrate the Classic and Rogerian method of essay writing. Notice the two very different tones, even though they have the same goal: No text messaging in class!

Rogerian Argument Style

Right now, as this document is being read, there are innumerable waves being transmitted all around us, bouncing from space to the earth and back again. I say innumerable because the word trillion or quadrillion won’t suffice. There is a virtually infinite number of waves around us, invisible to our eyes. And what rides upon those waves? Information.
Wireless technology and all of its handheld gadgets have become seemingly invaluable tools in our social and work-related lives. But do they have a place in the classroom? They could. Blackberries, I-phones, and Droids (oh my!) could heighten one’s educational experience, assuming the device is in the right hands. If a student ponders over a strange word written on a chalkboard, she need only to use a “dictionary app” on her i-touch, and then the obscure Elizabethan poetry will suddenly make sense. Students can do instant fact checking during history class whenever their professor struggles for an exact date. And would it be so terrible if a college student used text-messaging to check on transportation, baby-sitters, or a loved one in the hospital. A glimpse of text could provide a student with peace of mind, allowing them to mentally settle in for the rest of the class.
Of course, these amazing devices are more frequently used by students to discreetly entertain themselves in order to survive a dreadfully boring two-hour class. Can we blame a student if he longs for a bit of electronic escapism?
Unfortunately, all of these positive aspects of the latest Web 2.0 trend are nullified if they are a distraction to the instructor. Despite all of the potential benefits and amusements from text-messages, instant sports updates, and (my personal favorite) Pocket God, students should respect the wishes of the instructor. After all, the teacher might belong to an older generation who views a student’s harmless glance at an i-phone as an act of mutiny. While it may be true that the professor is needlessly over-reacting, he is ultimately the one who writes the syllabus, delineates the grades, and creates the rules.
What then is the solution for wireless addicts? Perhaps if the students earnestly discussed and displayed the academic benefits connected with this new technology, gradual changes – even improvements – could be made within the classroom environment. Students should demonstrate the many educational possibilities Web 2.0 has to offer. After all, it wasn’t long ago that many college professors forbid laptops in the classroom; yet now they are commonplace, and in some cases essential. A similar revolution could take place with hand-held devices.
Or, for students who do not have the patience or ability to sit for two hours without updating their Facebook status, most colleges now offer online classes. With this option, text-loving students can sit in front of their computers doing what they do best. And the old fashioned teachers can stand by their chalkboards in a traditional classroom, free of those intimidating and distracting wireless gadgets.

Classic Argument Style

I’m a laid-back teacher. I don’t care if students show up late to my class. It doesn’t bother me. And I don’t mind if a student brings in a snack. They don’t even need to share. Students can bring Starbucks along with them. Students can dutifully take notes in my class, if they like; but they are just as welcome to rest their head on their desk and sleep, provided they don’t snore. Students can doodle, draw unicorns, or design their dream home during class. Students can read along in their literature book or scramble through a late batch of algebra homework. Notice that all of these activities are done in the open, on the student’s desk, and not done in a stupid act of subversion such as an under-the-desk text message.
Don’t get me wrong. I prefer my students to be attentive, on time, and courteous to others. What I am trying to convey is that the above activities do not distract me from my love of teaching. They do not scatter my thoughts away from the beauty of literature and the complexity of the writing process. But as soon as I glimpse a student covertly clicking away at a hand-held electronic device, once my eye is caught by a “text-messenger,” I lose my train of thought. The fire of my lecture is extinguished. The discussion screeches to a halt.
It might seem like a silly, harmless thing to the students. They might believe it does not interfere with their learning process. However, it interferes with the instructor’s communication process. It is the instructor’s responsibility to establish the rules in the syllabus. It is the student’s responsibility to abide by the rules – or else find another class in which they can butcher the English language with their not-so-secret text messages. Any student who uses such devices during class is not only being disrespectful and immature, they are undercutting their own writing and critical thinking skills. Furthermore, they are limiting their ability to concentrate. They are giving into a pattern of instant gratification and quick, meaningless amusement. It is as though they cannot tolerate five minutes with their own thoughts; they must be in constant communication with the virtual beehive known as Web 2.0. They cannot detach themselves from the electronic umbilical cord that connects them with friends, booty calls, and the strangers, stalkers and losers who live in a strangely pointless realm called Twitter. In short, these students need to abandon their wireless wombs and grow up.

January 19, 2010

Moorpark EngM01A Schedule – Spring 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Administrator @ 1:58 am

English M01A – Reading / Assignment Schedule

Jan 19th: Essay Fundamentals
Imagery / Descriptive / Narrative Writing

Jan 21st: Discuss Ideas Across Time: p. 1-19
Proposal Essay Workshop

Jan 26th: Discuss Ideas Across Time:
(The Ghosts of Ellis Island – p. 37 – 44)
Classic vs. Rogerian Argument Workshop

Jan 28th: Standing Debate
Discuss Ideas Across Time p. 308 – 319

Feb. 2nd : Compare / Contrast Workshop
Discuss Ideas Across Time p. 696 – 701

Feb 4th: Definition Workshop
Discuss Ideas Across Time p. 496 – 527

Feb 9th: Arguments from Literature (Readings TBA)
In-text Citation Workshop

Feb 11th: Draft Day – Bring in at least 4 paragraphs of Argument Essay
Division / Classification Workshop

Feb 16th: Argument Essay Due
Process Analysis Workshop
(Select/discuss two essays from Ideas Across Time Chapter 3: Science)

Feb 18th: Process Analysis Workshop
(Select/discuss two essays from Ideas Across Time Chapter 5: Democratic Society)

Feb 23rd: In-Class Essay – (Midterm)

Feb 25th: Discuss Research Paper Topics
Cause / Effect Workshop

Mar. 2nd: Discuss Ideas Across Time p. 339 – 347
Machiavelli Workshop

Mar. 4th: Select / discuss two essays from Chapter Eight: Death and Dying
Practice Poetry Analysis

Mar 9th: Arguments in Poetry (Reading TBA)

Mar. 11th: Brainstorming / Research Group-work
Poetry Presentations: Day One

Mar. 16th: Poetry Presentations: Day Two

Mar. 18th: Poetry Presentations: Day Three

Mar 23rd: Select/discuss two essays from Ideas Across Time Chapter Seven: Art

Mar 25th: Research Essay Due
Introduction to Fiction and Dramatic Literature

Mar. 29th – April 4th: SPRING BREAK

April 6th: Discuss Act One of August: Osage County

April 8th: Thematic Analysis Workshop

April 13th: Discuss Act Two of August: Osage County

April 15th: Intro / Conclusion Workshop

April 20th: Continue Discussion of Acts One and Two

April 22nd: Sentence Variety Workshop

April 27th: Discuss Act Three of August Osage County

April 29th: Sentence Variety Workshop

May 4th: Watch Video (Title TBA)

May 6th: Discuss Themes from Video
Discuss In-class Final

May 11th: One – on – one Drafting Sessions

May 13th: Final In-Class Essay
Literary Analysis Due

January 12, 2010

Moorpark – Spring 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Administrator @ 8:29 am

English M01A
Instructor: Wade Bradford
Email: profwade@hotmail.com

COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course emphasizes the principles and methods of essay writing, with reading and analysis of prose and literature. The primary purpose of this course is to present an acceptable and conventional way to organize expository writing, so that students can convey their ideas clearly, concisely, logically, and persuasively.

PROCEDURE:
Class time will be used for discussion, analysis, and evaluation of assigned readings and for writing and speaking activities concerning various rhetorical concepts and strategies. Class participation is necessary for student understanding and progress. There will be at least three “major” papers, numerous journal entries, a mid-term exam, and a final exam
Students are expected to have read the assignments BEFORE class discussion of them and to participate in the discussions. Quizzes may be used to determine how actively the students have read the material.

ATTENDANCE:
Regular class attendance assures that students will not miss assignments and will receive assignment instructions firsthand. After three absences, each unexcused absence may cost students up to 2% of their grade. After four unexcused absences, I reserve the right to drop you from the course. (Remember, it is your responsibility to withdraw from a course. Don’t expect a teacher to drop you just because you stop coming to class. They might keep you on the roster!)

GRADES:
Many students often wonder: “How do I get an A?” In English you’ll find the grading system is quite subjective. Unlike math or science, there isn’t always a right or wrong answer. However, there are some basic requirements to “good writing.” Do your best to incorporate the following:

• Clear strong original thesis
• Appropriate support
• Logical / persuasive argumentation
• Well aligned introduction and conclusion
• Supportive details and specific examples
• Genuine interest or enthusiasm goes a long way too

ASSIGNMENT BREAKDOWN:
Workshops / Participation: 10%
Midterm In-Class Essay: 10%
Final In-Class Essay: 20%
Oral Presentation: 10%
Argument Essay: 10%
Research Essay: 20%
Literature Analysis: 20%

REGARDING PLAGIARISM
You must not steal the writing of others. Even cutting and pasting a single sentence is an act plagiarism. If you quote from another source, you must give reference to that source; otherwise, you are being highly unethical. Students who are caught plagiarizing (or cheating in some way or another) will be removed from my classroom. The English Department will then be notified and trouble will ensue. In short, think for yourself; write for yourself.

REGARDING E-MAIL AND LATE HOMEWORK
If you have any questions or comments, I’d love to hear from you. However, be advised: I do not accept work through email. It’s a big headache. You are responsible for bringing your work to class on time.

If you do not turn your paper in on time, I may still accept it. However, late papers are subject to penalty. I reserve the right to reduce the grade by fifty percent. Therefore, you are highly encouraged to turn your work in on time.

GROUP WORK & CLASS DISCUSSIONS
I value the Socratic method; this basically means that I enjoy asking students questions, listening to their responses, and asking follow up questions. Oftentimes, students will be develop questions of their own, and present their ideas to the class. To create a positive, friendly environment, please be respectful to your follow students as they share their thoughts. It’s not easy for everyone to speak publicly. Therefore, being an attentive listener will help to alleviate the fears of your fellow students.

BOOKS:

Ideas Across Time by Igor Webb
August:Osage County by Tracy Letts

Optional: Rules for Writers by Diana Hacker

TURN OFF ELECTRONIC DEVICES.

(YOU MAY SET CELL PHONES TO VIBRATE.)

DO NOT TEXT MESSAGE DURING CLASS. THOSE WHO DO WILL LOSE PARTICIPATION POINTS.

Scribbled by WordPress